- SAE《汽车工程》杂志记者也赶到这里，见证全新Nexo 燃料电池版、Kona电动版及现代自主研发的HVAC关键系统的冬季测试。
- By Sebastian Blanco
虽然这些数字都只是初步测试成果，但是Nexo高级工程师Sang Ho Yoon表示，Nexo的续航里程应该比途胜燃料电池版高35%左右，后者的美标测试结果为256英里（426公里）。
Frank还说道，车内搭载的3.7 kW Air Side PTC（正温度系数）热敏电阻也是快速制热的一大功臣。早在90年代，人们就开始研究使用PTC热敏电阻作为车载加热器。有些汽油车也采用了PTC热敏电阻，例如一些三缸欧系车搭载的1Kw PTC单元。而在替代能源车辆上，PTC才真正有了用武之地。
Kona电动版分为两款。第一款的电池容量为64 kWh，续航里程为470公里（292英里），（这里所有续航里程都只是基于WLTP“世界协调车辆排放试验规程”制定的目标数据。）功率为204hp，百公里加速7.6秒。第二款的电池容量为39kWh，续航里程为300公里（186英里），电机功率为135 hp，百公里加速9.3秒。两款的最大扭矩都是395N·m。如果使用100kW的快充器，第一款车可在不到一个小时内充满80%的电量，但如果使用7.2 kW Level 2充电器，充电时间将长达近10小时。
和Nexo一样，Kona 电动版也采用了Air Side PTC热敏电阻，功率为5kW，此外还有一个2.7kW的热泵。之所以采用比Nexo更强劲的PTC，是因为Kona电动版没有燃料电池堆的余热可供座舱制热。不过，Kona还是可以汲取电机等其它电子零部件的热能。
这两款零排放车型都采用了防滑轮胎，驾驶稳定性很好。Kona采用的是大陆215-55 R 17 V XL WinterContact TS 850P 轮胎，Nexo则选用了韩泰Winter I-cept Evo2 245/45R19 102V M+S轮胎。
AE goes way north for an inside look at Hyundai’s winter testing of the new Nexo FCV and Kona EV and their unique and critical HVAC systems.
View gallery »
Arjeplog, Sweden sits around 35 miles (57 km) below the Arctic Circle, but this remote city has been a bustling hub for the automotive industry for decades. Since the first winter tests were conducted here in the 1973, the area has become a second home to a dozen OEMs and suppliers during the brutally cold winter months. Engineers take over the small town every winter when average high temperatures hover around 19°F (-7 C) and the average low is a brisk 3°F (-16 C).
To make room for the influx, residents rent out their homes to the auto industry, moving into guest rooms or in campers parked with relatives or friends in other parts of town. These temporary living situations are required as the automotive industry pushes forward to greener powertrains.
Hyundai has a particular impetus to test where it's cold. Battery EVs and fuel-cell vehicles (FCV) have unique cold-climate operating characteristics, and those propulsion types will play a major role in the company's aim to vie for the global eco-car sales lead by 2025. Ensuring optimum HVAC system cold-climate performance for EVs and FCVs is paramount.
Arjeplog, then, has become like a second home to engineer Gunther Frank, Hyundai’s head of Functional Vehicle Development. Automotive Engineering was invited to join Frank and his team in their winter lair in early 2018 as they prepared the new Nexo fuel cell vehicle and the Kona EV for production.
Hyundai does most basic HVAC development work using a climate chamber at its Namyang Technology Research Center in Korea. Then the cars come to Sweden for on-site field tests and fine tuning. Frank said a car typically spends one to two weeks in cold weather testing, and the same amount of time in hot weather. It's the in-between climate that actually takes longer, maybe three or four weeks, because it's difficult to get the full automatic temperature control (FATC) system just right.
"Mild climate conditions are much, much more complex, not from the performance point of view in terms of cooling or heating, but from the control point of view of the FATC," Frank said. "In alpine regions, when we are at a height of 2,500 meters (8,202 feet) where it is quite cool, and we are driving within an hour down to the valley where we see temperatures of 22 or 23 °C (72-73°F), the controller has to be aware of the changing conditions and react."
FATC is Hyundai's end goal for all of its vehicles, no matter what powertrain they use. The basic idea is that the driver can set a temperature, push the "auto" button, and then never think of the heating or cooling settings again.
"This would be the ideal situation, having just the 'auto' button, but human beings are so different," Frank said. "The way you feel one day in comparison to the other is also so different and you are never going to be able to create a control algorithm which will fit all of them. It's a very nice feature, but you have to make sure that the customer has the possibility to overwrite the system, because finally it's up to them."
The more important challenge for Frank and his team in Arjeplog, though, is getting consistent heat without the waste heat from a traditional ICE. Both of Hyundai's new fuel cell and all-electric vehicles use high-voltage electronic compressors. Unlike older compressors, which needed to run off of engine RPM, the electronic compressors can be run independently. They can also be turned off when the cabin climate is stable, which then reduces the load on the energy source and thus leads to increased efficiency.
The high-voltage systems can also heat up the cabin faster than an ICE, since they don't need a warm engine to work. "From the HVAC point of view, it's a much, much better situation than in the olden days," Frank noted. "If you don't have an electronic heating device, when you start your engine, it takes a very long time until the cabin becomes warm. With our high-voltage systems, we have the possibility to immediately warm up the cabin."
Heating the Nexo FCV
The Nexo is the Hyundai's second-gen fuel-cell vehicle, arriving some time in 2018. It follows the Tucson FCV and has increased fuel cell stack efficiency and performance. All of its components are newly developed. In fact, the Nexo achieves 60% fuel cell system efficiency, compared to the Tucson's 55%. Based on this improvement, along with an increase in the hydrogen storage available on board (three tanks that each hold 6.3 kg (13.9 lb) of hydrogen, the Nexo's driving range could reach over 800 km (497 mi) in NEDC city mode, and over 370 miles on the U.S. test cycle.
These numbers are preliminary, but Nexo senior engineer Sang Ho Yoon said the driving range would be around a 35% increase over the Tucson fuel cell. That vehicle is rated at 265 miles in the U.S.
The same energy used to move the car is needed to heat it, so developing an efficient HVAC system is important to achieving long range. While there are similarities between the HVAC system in the Nexo and a standard ICE vehicle – there is some free heat energy available because the stack needs to be cooled down – the overall process is quite different. The good news is that different also works.
Frank happily proved the Nexo's rapid heating power on a day when the outside ambient temperature was -23°C (-9.4 F). After just three minutes in the prototype, a breast-level temperate sensor showed it was 15°C (59 F) in the car.
"We have an internal target that with an ambient temperature of -20 C (-4 F), the average cabin temperature should reach an average of 18°C (64 F) after 20 minutes of driving," Frank said. "Believe me, it's quite tough to fulfill that with low-capacity internal combustion engine cars. With our full EV cars or with our fuel cell car, we are able to reach that target much, much faster."
Part of that quick heat comes from a 3.7-kW Air Side positive temperature coefficient (PTC) thermistor. The use of PTC thermistors as heaters in cars has been studied since at least the 1990s and they are used today in some gas cars, especially 1-kW units in 3-cylinder European vehicles. With alternative powertrain models, PTCs have really come into their own, Frank explained.
The first step to warming a fuel cell car's cabin, Frank explained, is to heat up the cooling system of the stack. While this happens, the PTC offers quick heat in the Nexo's cabin. Once the stack is warmed up and able to provide some excess heat, the PTC's power is reduced, even down to zero in the conditions we experienced in Sweden.
"When the car is in a stable condition, it's similar to internal combustion engine cars and we don't need additional electronic power to run the heating system," he said. "In stable conditions, there is no influence on driving range."
Hyundai developed a new membrane electrode assembly and 3D porous flow field in house for the Nexo. "The 3D porous flow field is a new concept for the Nexo stack," Yoon said. "It can improve the stack performance for power density." Yoon said the Nexo uses the world's smallest hydrogen supply system for automotive use because it does away with the hydrogen recirculating pump required in the Tucson fuel cell and only uses an ejector to supply hydrogen for the electrochemical reaction within the fuel cell stack.
A new thermal management system means improved response time to control the coolant temperature of the stack thanks to a two-way and a four-way valve. The four-way valve is a world's first for electric vehicles, Yoon said, and it improves the Nexo's cold-start ability. Cold starts are traditionally difficult for fuel cell vehicles, but the Nexo can start at ambient temperatures of -30°C (-22 F), the same threshold the company's ICE vehicles must pass.
That's not the only way the Nexo will function like an ICE. Thanks to a new, highly durable membrane, a new platinum catalyst in the stack, and a new operating control technology, Yoon said the durability rating for the new fuel cell powertrain warranty will cover 160,000 km (100,000 mi) and 10 years, just like the company's ICE vehicles.
The Nexo's powertrain has a maximum power output of 120 kW and 395 N·m. This will improve top speed by a claimed 10% and acceleration performance by 25%, compared to the Tucson FCEV.
Heating the Kona EV
The Kona EV will come in two flavors, a 64-kW·h model with up to 470 km (292 mi) of range (all range numbers here are just targets, and are based on WLTP homologation). This model offers 204 hp and a 0-100 km/h (0-62 mph) time of 7.6 seconds. The 39-kW·h model will get up to almost 300 km (186 mi) on a charge with a motor that generates 135 hp and hits 100 km/h in 9.3 seconds. Both powertrain versions deliver 395 N·m. On a 100-kW fast charger, the 64-kW·h battery can be charged to 80% in less than one hour. A 7.2-kW, Level 2 charger will take almost 10 hours to fully charge the larger pack.
One challenge with electric vehicles is that the battery temperature needs to be moderated along with the cabin. The Kona EV uses battery packs that are bigger than the ones used in Hyundai's Ioniq and Kia Soul EVs, which are air-cooled. The Kona's battery pack shouldn't get hotter than 40°C (104 F), which is why the battery in the Kona EV uses an active liquid cooling system in combination with a radiator to keep it from overheating. If this is not sufficient, the cabin's AC system can be used to cool down the battery as well.
Like the Nexo, the Kona EV prototype uses an AirSide PTC – this time a 5-kW unit – along with a 2.7-kW heat pump. A more powerful PTC is needed because there's no waste heat from a fuel cell stack to help warm the cabin. The Kona EV does manage to siphon some heat energy off of the electronic components, including the motor.
"We are able to transfer it and use that energy to warm up the cabin and to increase the efficiency of the overall heating system," Frank noted.
The heat pump system uses some heat energy from the air, ideally at ambient temperatures above 0°C (32 F), which then runs the AC drive cycle. At an ambient temperature of 0°C (32 F) and a cabin setting of 23°C (73F), "we are losing about 40% in comparison to heater off when we have a PTC system, but we are able to create 20% more energy with the heat pump system and therefore to increase the efficiency," Frank said.
Those are the numbers that Hyundai's winter test engineers have to crunch to keep drivers of their new powertrain vehicles happy. If the PTC and the FATC and all the rest can work in Arjeplog, chances are they will work in other parts of the world. If not, it's back to the cold for more testing.
Frozen-lake driving in a fuel cell car
Driving an early prototype gives only a hint of what the finished vehicle will act like, but spinning the upcoming Hyundai Nexo hydrogen fuel cell and the Kona EV around a frozen lake in northern Sweden prove there's more than one way to tune an eco car.
The Nexo, as seems appropriate for what will almost certainly be the more expensive of the two models, has a softer suspension and an aggressive stability control system that prevented the FCEV from ever really losing its footing, even when speeding around Hyundai's circular ice track. Throttle and steering response were dramatically limited and the system's interventions were early and substantial, which bodes well for the safety of the eventual production vehicle. There was not a lot of oversteer and there wasn't much to do about the understeer in the icy circumstances.
The Kona EV, on the other hand, felt further from production ready, with plenty of noise coming from the back when pushed to the frozen limits. The safety control strategy is also tuned different here, allowing us to mildly drift the car on the lake. This meant more fun on the safe confines of the expansive ice track, and it means the EV might be the more fun of the two models.
Thankfully, the Kona EV's floor-mounted battery creates a low center of gravity that helps keep the car firm locked onto the track. It was difficult to test out the EV's flat-our acceleration on the slippery surfaces, but the impressive torque got the tires spinning on the ice, even when we were already at 100 km/h (62 mph). Even so, pushing the accelerator pedal all the way to the floor didn't do much once the system detected slippery conditions and neutered our input.
Thanks in part to their grippy tires, both zero-emission vehicles kept their composure. The Kona rode on Continental 215-55 R 17 V XL WinterContact TS 850P tires, while the Next wore Hankook’s Winter I-cept Evo2 245/45R19 102V M+S.
Author: Sebastian Blanco
Source: SAE Automotive Engineering Magazine